One sentence in. A document out.
Proposals, scopes, contracts and engagement letters, written from the work you have already won.
The same sentence. Four different documents.
Documents is not a proposal tool. The same brief, the same rate card and the same voice produce whichever document the moment calls for.
Brand sprint proposal
Brandwell Studio · scope of work
Services agreement
Brandwell Studio · terms and liability
Bookkeeping engagement
Kerr and Co · services included
Variation 1
Brandwell Studio · change to signed scope
It sounds like you, because it is you.
The objection to AI documents is that they read like AI documents. Friday does not write from a template. It writes from the proposals you already sent and the client already signed.
From the call to the signature, in one week.
Then it stops being your problem.
The document does not end at the signature. It becomes the record the job, the invoice and the next variation all read from.
- Filed against the client and the job, not a folder you named in 2023
- Every version kept, and the signed one unambiguous
- The same record your invoice and your next variation read from
- Searchable and exportable, in formats you can open elsewhere
| Document | Client | Version | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand sprint proposal | Brandwell | v3 | Signed |
| Variation 1 | Brandwell | v1 | Sent |
| Bookkeeping engagement letter | Kerr and Co | v2 | Signed |
| Q3 advisory scope | Nordhaus | v1 | Draft |
Scope crept. Now say so.
The awkward conversation is awkward because nobody can find what was agreed. Here the document has already had it.
